From 39f19113d30e87c1604ed4e8e39ea95f87296767 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mattias Andrée Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 08:54:40 +0100 Subject: m + macro call alternation elimination MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Signed-off-by: Mattias Andrée --- doc/info/mds.texinfo | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/info/mds.texinfo b/doc/info/mds.texinfo index c6b7f0b..74e1720 100644 --- a/doc/info/mds.texinfo +++ b/doc/info/mds.texinfo @@ -5418,11 +5418,11 @@ you can write It is undefined in which order alternations and unordered subsequences are expanded; neither sequencewise or levelwise. -Thus, there should not side-effects where +Thus, there should not be side-effects where either one is used, nor does it make since to nest the two constructs in any other -way than alternation inside unordered -subsequence. +way than alternation or unordered subsequence +inside unordered subsequence. -- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2